What is a significant outcome of effective architecture governance in TOGAF?

A significant outcome of effective architecture governance in TOGAF is improved performance and compliance with architecture principles. Architecture governance serves as a framework that ensures that all architectural endeavors align with the organization's goals and adhere to established principles, guidelines, and standards. By implementing robust governance processes, organizations can ensure that architecture decisions are made in a structured manner, which facilitates consistency and quality across projects.

Effective governance also means that the architecture is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the business environment, technology landscape, or stakeholder needs. This leads to improved performance as projects are more likely to deliver the intended value and meet business objectives. Furthermore, by ensuring compliance with architecture principles, governance mitigates risks associated with architectural misalignments and fosters a culture of accountability among stakeholders.

In contrast, the other options do not reflect the primary benefits associated with effective architecture governance. Higher project costs are generally viewed as a drawback of excessive bureaucracy rather than an outcome of good governance. Enhanced competition among architecture teams is not a goal of governance and may lead to fragmented approaches, while reduced stakeholder involvement contradicts the principles of inclusive decision-making that TOGAF promotes. Overall, the alignment achieved through effective governance is crucial for organizational success in implementing architecture.