How does TOGAF suggest measuring the success of an architecture implementation?

TOGAF emphasizes that the success of an architecture implementation should be gauged against the objectives outlined in the Architecture Vision. This framework encourages a strategic approach to architecture where alignment with business goals and anticipated benefits is paramount. By assessing whether the architecture meets these predefined objectives, organizations can better determine if the architecture is providing the intended value and realizing the promised business benefits.

This focus on measurable outcomes helps ensure that the architecture is not only technically sound but also effectively supports the organization's strategic direction. Additionally, it promotes accountability and continuous improvement by providing a clear basis for evaluation and adjustment as needed in future iterations of the architecture.

The other options, while they touch on aspects of architectural success, do not align as closely with TOGAF's principles. User satisfaction is important but is only one facet of the broader evaluation of success. Measuring the number of architectural components developed could mislead stakeholders, as quantity does not necessarily equate to value or effectiveness. Similarly, considering only the speed of implementation overlooks the importance of alignment, quality, and outcomes.